Sunday, August 25, 2013

The Boxer Rebellion


Beginning in 1898, groups of peasants in northern China began to band together into a secret society known as I-ho ch'üan ("Righteous and Harmonious Fists"), called the "Boxers" by Western press. Members of the secret society practiced boxing and calisthenic rituals (hence the nickname, the "Boxers") which they believed would make them impervious to bullets.

At first, the Boxers wanted to destroy the Ch'ing dynasty (which had ruled China for over 250 years) and wanted to rid China of all foreign influence (which they considered a threat to Chinese culture). When the Empress Dowager backed the Boxers, the Boxers turned solely to ridding China of foreigners.

By late 1899, bands of Boxers were massacring Christian missionaries and Chinese Christians. By May 1900, the Boxer Rebellion had come out of the countryside and was being waged in the capital of Peking (now Beijing). To help their fellow countrymen and to protect their interests in China, an international force of 2,100 American, British, Russian, French, Italian, and Japanese soldiers were sent to subdue the "rebellion."

On June 18, 1900, the Empress Dowager ordered all foreigners to be killed. Several foreign ministers and their families were killed before the international force could protect them. On August 14, 1900, the international force took Peking and subdued the rebellion.

The Boxer Rebellion weakened the Ch'ing dynasty's power and hastened the Republican Revolution of 1911 that overthrew the boy emperor and made China a republic.




Boxer Fighters
Troops of the Eight nations alliance in 1900.
 Left to right: Britain, United States, Australian, British India,
Germany, France, Austria-Hungary, Italy, Japan

Saturday, August 24, 2013

Classification of Tribes in India


The Tribes of India can be classified based on :

(i) Territorial Distribution
(ii) Linguistic Distribution
(iii) Occupational Distribution
(iv) Physical Characteristics
(v) Classification according to Culture Contact

(i) Territorial Distribution

According to the first classification, they may be divided into four important groups :
(a) the tribes living in the northern and north-eastern zone;
(b) tribes inhabiting the central zone,
(c) tribes scattered over the extreme corners of south- western India in the hills and the converging lines of the Ghats; and
(d) small groups in several parts of the country or even within the political boundary of the country.

(a)The most important tribes living between Assam and Tibet may be mentioned the Aka, the Dafla, the Miri, Gurung, and the Aptanic on the West of the Subansiri river, and the Gallong, the Minyong the Pasi, the Padam and the Pangi in the Dehong valley. The Mishmi tribes live in the high ranges between the Debong and Lohit rivers, the Chulikata and Belejiyas on the western and the Digaree and the Meju on the eastern parts. Farther east are found the Khamtis and the Singhops and beyond them, converging on the south are the different Naga tribes occupying the mountain valleys on both sides of the Patkois.

The Naga tribes consist of five major groups: the Rangpan and the Konyak in the northern; the Rengma and the Sema, and the Angami in the western; the AoLahota, Phom, Chang, Santam and the Yimstsunger in the central; the Kacha and the Kabui in the southern and the Tangakhul and theKalyo-Kengu in the eastern section. South of the Naga hills running through the States of Manipur, Tipperah, the Chittagong hill tracts live the Kukis, the Lushais, the Lakhers, the Chins, the Khasis and the Garos, many of whom are really overflows of the tribes from across the Frontiers or are closely related. In the Sub-Himalayan region in Sikkim and the northern portions of Darjeeling, there are a number of rather primitive tribes of whom the Lepchas are the best known. In U. P. and UTK also a number of tribes such as the Tharus, Bhoksa, Khasa, Korwa, Bijar, Bhuia, Majhi, Cheri, Raji, and Kharwar are found. 


(b) The central or the middle zone is separated from the north-eastern zone by the gap between the Garo hills and Rajmahal hills and consists of plateaus and mountainous belt between the Indo- Gangetic plain to the north and roughly the Krishna river to the South.

In this zone we have another massing of tribal peoples in M. P. with extensions in U.P.,UTK, MP,Chattisgarh and AP, Southern Rajasthan, Northern Maharashtra, Bihar,Jharkhand, Orissa. Northern Rajasthan, Southern Maharashtra and Bastar form the peripheral areas of this zone. The important tribes inhabiting this zone beginning from the Eastern Ghats and Orissa hills are the Savara, Gadabi, and Borido of the Ganjam district; the Juang Kharia, Khond, Bhumij and the Bhuiya of the Orissa hills. In the plateau of the Chota Nagpur live the Mundas, the Santhals, the Oraons, the Hos and the Birhors. Further west along the Vindhya ranges live the Katkaris, Kols and the Bhils, the latter extending as far as north-west as the Aravalli hills. The Gonds form the largest group and occupy what is known as the 'Gondwanaland' and extend southwards into AP and Chattisgarh.On both sides of the Satpuras and around the Maikal hills are found similar tribes like the Korku, the Agaria, the Pardhan and the Baigas. In the hills of Bastar State live some of the most picturesque of these tribes, the Murias, the Hill Murias of the Adbhujhamar hills and the Bison- horn Marias of the Indravati valley. Majority of these people show similarity of race and culture.


(c) The third zone consists of that part of the Southern India which falls south of the river Krishna (below latitude 16 N) stretching from Wynaad to Cape Comorin.AP,Karnataka,TN,Kerala fall within this zone. From the fact that they occupy these marginal areas and also from the records in the oldest Tamil literature of the Sangam period they appear to be one of the most ancient and primitive inhabitants now living in India having been pushed by the intrusion of more advanced people into their present habitats, where safety and shelter were found against increasing pressure.

Beginning from the north-east the Chenchus occupy the area of the Nallaimallais hills across the Krishna and into the AP State. Along the western Ghats from the Koraga of South Kanara, the Yeruvas and the Todas living in the lower slopes of Coorg hills; the Irulas, Paniyans and Kurumbas of Wynaad, and stretching almost to Kaniya Kumari along the ranges of Cochin and Travancore and sheltered in the isolation of the forest are found the most primitive of Indian aboriginal such as Kadars, Kanikkars, Malvadan, Malakurvan, with many of their original traits still preserved. 


(d) In addition to these three major zones there is a fourth small and isolated zone consisting of Andamans and Nicobar Islands. The main tribes  living in this zone are the Jarawa, Onge, North Sentineless, the Andmanese and the Nicobarese,though separated from the main body of India's aboriginal tribes are ethnically connected with them. 


(ii) Linguistic Affiliation

Linguistically these tribes may be divided into a number of groups based on their affiliation to the various families of languages :

(a) The Austro-Asiatic linguistic branch under which come the Kol or Munda speeches of the Central and Eastern India, Khasi of Assam. Nicobarese in the Nicobar Islands.

Santali found in Bihar,Jharkhand, Orissa, West Bengal and Assam; Mundari; Ho; Kharia ; Bhumij , Garo ; Khasi and few other which  belong to Bihar and Assam. The language of Korku is spoken in M. P. and Berar; while Savana (Saora) and Gadaba are spoken in Orissa. Outside the Kol group, there is the language of Nicobarese in the Nicobar Islands.

(b) The Dravidian Linguistic Group is popular in Central and Southern India. It is spoken by Gonds Gondi in M. P.,Chattisgarh, AP States ; Khondh or Khond in Orissa ; Kui ; the Kurukh or Oraon in Bihar,Jharkhand and Orissa ; Mai to in Rajmahal hills in Bihar. The other tribes under this group are : Maler, Polia, Saora, Koya, Paniyan, Chenchu, Irulas, Kadar, Malser and Malakurwan.

(c) The Tibeto-Chinese (Sino-Tibetan) family includes the tribal languages of various people belonging to the Mongoloid element and found along the southern  slopes of the Himalayas, from northern Punjab to Bhutan and also in northern and eastern Bengal and in Assam, e.g., the Nagas, the Kuki, the Abhors, the Dafla, the Miris, the Khasi and the Mikirs.

(iii) Occupational Classification

The tribes of India not only speak different languages, but also have distinctive economy of their own. They live in different economic stages ranging from food gathering and hunting through shifting cultivation to settled plough cultivation, e.g., the Birhot, Kharia, Korua and Hill Maraia,Malapantaram, Kadar, the Paniyan, etc. The Paliyan depend on food-gathering and hunting for their livelihood. The Baiga, Pauri (hill) Bhuiyan, Jhuang Maria, Khond, Naga and Kutia Kandh are shifting cultivators.

The Munda, Bhils, Baiga, Gond, Majhwar,Kharwar and Ho Santal and Oraon depend primarily on permanent plough cultivation for their living. The Naga tribes have developed a system of terraced cultivation with elaborate means of irrigation by aqueducts.

Dr. Hutton classified these tribes into three groups : (i) Primitive tribes collecting forest produce, (ii) Primitive tribes, pastoral and (iii) tribes practicing settled agriculture(who keep poultry, rattle, know weaving, spinning,pottery and terraced farming) , hunting, fishing and industries.

(iv) Physical Characteristics 

(a)Physically the tribes of the north-east frontier are Mongoloid with light skin colour, straight and -dark hair and flat nose and prominent cheek bones. Majority of them are of medium stature with long heads, scanty hair growth on body and face and almond-shaped eyes. All these tribes, including the women, are muscular with great development of calf-muscles. They are great mountaineers and carry considerable amount of loads to high altitudes. They are healthy, hard-working and of independent spirit and their life is well balanced with democratic councils and considerable stress on personal liberty of thought and action. They have childlike simplicity and are very honest but not trained for sustained labour and concentration of mind. This type is represented by the Nagas, semi-Nagas, Chakmas, Mughs, and Lepchas.

(b) In the central zone the Negrito strain is most marked. The tribes very largely conform to the pattern of what are called the "Austroloid characters." Physically they are from short to medium stature, dark skinned with long head, and generally possessing curly but not frizzly hairs, road and flat nose but depressed at the root, fleshy everted lips. They are strong, muscular and well-built. This type is represented by the tribes like the Chenchus, Kurumbas, the Yeruvas, Malayans, Munda, Kols, Santhals and the Bhils.

(c) In the southern zone there is an undoubted Negrito strain, although at present greatly submerged, but still surviving among some of the more primitive and isolated of these tribes such as the Kadars of Perambiculam, hills of Cochin,and the Irulas and Panyans of the Wynaad. Physically they are of short to medium stature, of deep chocolate brown skin colour, small head, bulbous forehead, smooth brow- ridges and feeble chins.
The face is short and protruding and the nose flat and broad and the lips are thick and everted, the head shape is long, hair fine and of wooly nature and the body well developed.

At the present time they are greatly intermixed and it is only in the extreme interior that more archaic types are to be found.

Note : Tribes in India 

1.According to Risley's Classification - Dravidian and Mongoloid Groups
2.According to Guha Classification - Negrito,Proto-Australoid,Mongoloids(Paleo and Tibeto)
3.According to Sarkar's Classification-Australoid,Mundari speaking,Far-Eastern,Mongoloid

(v) Classification according to culture-contact

There are four main cultural divisions among the aboriginals. The first two classes consist of the comparatively small block of real primitives living in the hills. Their religion is characteristic and alive ; their tribal organisation is unimpaired ; their artistic and choreographic traditions are unbroken; their mythology still vitalizes the healthy organism of tribal life. Geographical conditions have largely protected them from the debasing contacts of the plains".

The wilder aboriginals have to be sub-divided into two sections :

(a) the first class in the most primitive and simple stage of all is comprised of Hill Marias of Chattisgarh State, the Juangs of Keonjhar and Pal-Labara, the Gadabas and Bondos of Orissa, the Baigas, andaria and Kawaedha, many of smaller communities and more isolated villages even of comparatively sophisticated tribes.

This group has the following characteristics :

(i) Its members live a largely communal life like those of the Hill Marias, Hill Baigas and the Juangs
(ii) Economically they share one another ;
(iii) Their life still centres round a peculiar form of agriculture (Jhum) and
(iv) They are shy of strangers but among themselves honest, simple and innocent. Crime is rare and women virtuous.

(b) The second class of aboriginals live in country equally remote and they are equally attached to their solitude and to their ancient traditions but they have begun to change in many ways. The important tribes of their class are Bison-horn Marias or the Bhomia and Binjhwar and Baigas. 

Their chief characteristics are :(i) Their village life has become individualistic, (ii) They no longer share things with one another, (iii) Axe-cultivation is more a habit rather than a part of their life ; (iv) They are more accustomed to outside life and are generally less simple and honest than the above class.

(c) The third class of aboriginals is the most numerous. It consists of all those who under the influence of external contact have begun to lose their stronghold on tribal culture, religion and social organisation.

(d) The fourth class, which consists of the old aristocracy of the country represented today by the great Bhil, Naga chieftains, the Gond Rajas, a few Bin jh war and Bhiuya landlords, Korku noblemen, wealthy Santhal and Utaon leaders and some highly cultured Mundas. These retain the old tribal name and their clan and totem rules and observe elements of tribal religion though they generally adopt the full Hindu faith and live in modern style.

Process of Transformation of Tribal Cultures

The process through which the tribal cultures are usually transformed or modified may be either :

(i) simple adoption, which means the acquisition of technical skill, adoption of tools, implements, ideas, customs and rites by one social group from another, e.g. the Warli of Thana district is yet simple and unostentatious, put on a loin cloth without anything on his head but his colleague in the south being in much contact with the Kolis puts on a shirt, dhoti and turban after the latter's fashion. Similar taking over of the elements of material culture from neighbouring groups is found in all tribes today especially the Bhils, the Gonds and the Santhals, etc.

(ii) Acculturation is the process of change due to contacts with other people. It involves acceptance and adoption. A tribe in contact with civilization may accept some of the traits of their neighbours such as the employment of Hindu priest in indigenous ceremonies and festivals among some of the tribes in Bihar is an example of simple acceptance. Similarly Munda tribes have accepted some of the cultural traits from their neighbours, while Raj ban sis have shown an adaptation to Hindu culture. The Lambadis of the Deccan have taken to agriculture, they have adopted the dress of their neighbours and tribe is divided into sections based on occupations. Similar adaptation is found among certain sections of the Gonds, the Raj Gonds and the Navgharia Gonds and the Bhils.

(iii) Assimilation, by a gradual drift to Hinduism. When certain members of a primitive tribe move down into the plains they tend to become assimilated in contrast to other members who remain behind. The evidence of assimilation in many cases is apparent. Certain Santhals of Bengal give distinctly Hindu names to their children, practise child-marriage before the age of 7, revere the Tulsi plant, abstain from beef, cleanse "their living quarters with cowdung, decline food cooked by Muslims, cremate their dead and place the vermillion mark and the iron bangle upon their wives."

Effects of Culture Contacts

The effects of such contacts have been very far-reaching on the life of the aboriginals. Contacts with civilisation have undermined social solidarity, invaded tribal security, introduced discomforts, diseases and vices. The results may be detailed as below :

(i) The rapid opening up of the means of communications has resulted more in conflict than in useful contact not necessarily a conflict of arms but of culture and material interest. Says Dr. Hutton, "Attempts to develop minerals, forests or land for intensive cultivation can only be made at the expense of the tribes whose isolation is thus invaded : tribal customs which regulate the ownership or transfer of land are normally superseded by a Code in the application of which the tribe is deprived of its property, generally in the name of law, either by alienation to foreigners or by transferring the trusteeship of a tribal chief into absolute ownership of a kind foreign to the customs of a tribe. The complicated system of administration of justice has tended to impair the natural truthfulness and honesty of the people and social solidarity of the tribes has weakened the authority of the social heads and the respect they formerly commanded." In spite of the best intentions a lot of injustice is done to the aboriginals by the Judges and Magistrates and the police officers of all grades owing to their ignorance of customs and mentality of the aboriginal tribes they have to deal with.

(ii) The introduction of the outstill system in tribal area in mines and industrial centres, where they frequent for employment, has led to an increase in drunkenness and immorality. "The temptation of distilary liquor", wrote Shri S. C. Roy, "introduced by the Government in some aboriginal areas is another evil that is working havoc, economically, morally and physically

(iii) One of the most important effects of contacts has been the spread of diseases in tribal areas. Mills has shown, while writing about the effects on some primitive tribes of Assam of contact with civilization, "That improved communications while they have immensely facilitated internal trade, have undoubtedly spread disease; not only have specific diseases such as venereal diseases and T. B. been introduced but epidemics spread more quickly. The opening of the road to Manipur has led to an increase in prostitution.'' Emigration of labour from tribal areas to plantations and factories where conditions are not favourable to settlement has been the main source for the spread of epidemic diseases. The lure of free life unhampered by social control pulls women to plantations and factories where they are tempted to a corrupt life and the large incidence of V. D. like syphilis and diabetes, gonnorohea, etc., among the labourers is directly traceable to such indiscriminate mixing of the sexes. Missionaries and the philanthrophic agencies have caused T. B., and other contact diseases to spread in tribal areas through indiscretion, as for example, doling out second hand clothes and apparels collected from the dead or diseased population, which are a foci of infection.

(iv) Urban contacts have everywhere disorganised primitive social life. The village has ceased to be living community; it is now an aggregate of isolated units. Old myths are being forgotten and the old gods neglected. Many of the traditional dances which used to provide recreation to the youths of both sexes, translate joys and sorrows are being abandoned and village politics, rivalry and social disputes are replacing their old-time recreation. The effects of this transfer of interests have already been evident in the high incidence of imported diseases, poor physique, inferiority complex and a bitter Antagonism against advanced groups in the neighbourhood.

(v) A large number of tribes have been living on hunting and collection of jungle products supplemented by Jhum cultivation. The effects of Jhum cultivation have led to strict rules regarding denudation of forests and today many of the tribes (who lived by shifting cultivation) have come down to the plains though most have not succeeded in adapting themselves to other kinds of agriculture found in the plains. This is mostly
due to tribal inertia, shyness of the aborigines, apathy of administration and as Dr. Hutton says, may be due to ignorance of appropriate magico- religious ceremonial necessary for other types of farming."

(vi) Many tribes have failed to maintain their tribal structures and have either been assimilated with more vital stock or have withdrawn themselves from contacts as a defensive measure. The Andamanese, Korwas, Todas and Chenchus are on evil days and are preparing themselves for exit. Some other tribes have left their tribal moorings and have settled in the neighbourhood of higher cultural groups whom they serve. Today they have developed some sort of interdependence. The Gond tribe of M. P. and Bhils of southern-eastern Rajasthan may be taken as an example.

(vii) The nomadic tribes who secured their livelihood by catering to the periodical requirements of settled communities as the Marwaris or the Lakhota supplying agricultural implements to the latter or repairing their indigenous tools and utensils, the Nats supplying crude nostrums for the restoration of the lost manhood, the Kanjars providing amusements, acrobatics and dances for the village communities, find it difficult to continue their customary life and have enlisted themselves into the ranks of criminal tribes whose attention to the rural communities is a perpetual concern of the administration.

(viii) Lastly, the itinerant seller of goods and trinkets, the moneylender, the licensee of excise shops, collectors of lac, honey and other forest produce are mostly aliens in culture and language. They have settled in tribal areas and have taken advantage of the gradual drift of tribal society from a moneyless economy to one in which exchange depends on the circulation of money. The implications of money economy are better understood by them and thus they have succeeded in solidly entrenching themselves in tribal areas and today they are a source of great discomfort to the tribal people. In many areas the land has passed from the aborigines to the moneylenders and sahukars who make the very people work for them. 

Sunday, August 18, 2013

A Thinking Man


Socrates - A Great Thinker








Relevance of  his Ideas 



1. They’ve Never Been Rendered Obsolete


For starters, it’s crucial to note that, unlike many other intellectual disciplines of the ancient Greek period such as, say, ancient Greek astronomy, Socrates’ philosophies remain just as pertinent as the day they were conceived (or at least the day they were recorded by his student Plato).Socrates and his disciples’ theories are a crucial foundation of modern Western philosophical thought – all others since have basically been constructed upon them.

2. He Taught Us to Question Everything

“The highest form of Human Excellence is to question oneself and others,” Socrates once said. His dialectic method of inquiry – breaking a subject down into a dialogue between two or more people with differing views, both mutually in search of the same truth – taught us to assume nothing and to scrutinize everything, and gave us a system by which to do it. It remains a key element of scientific study today – beginning with a hypothesis and then distilling it until a definitive conclusion is reached.

3. He Taught Us That Life is Worthless Without Happiness

Socrates asked – what’s the point in battleships and city walls, unless the people building them and protected by them are happy?

If we aren’t in pursuit of happiness and understanding in our daily lives, then we’re basically akin to ants toiling at an ant-hill. Sure, we go about our practical tasks instinctually. But we also need to step back and develop an awareness of the world, and form a conscious relationship with our existence.

Socrates asked – what’s the point in battleships and city walls, unless the people building them and protected by them are happy? The same remains true today – unless we’re mindful of spiritual well-being in our daily toil, we’re little better off than insects. As he famously put it: “The unexamined life is not a life worth living for a human being.”

Socrates believed that the universal aspiration for all men should be was virtue. However, virtue must be known before it can be desired and achieved, which requires attention and commitment. This aspiration to a higher state, ideal and disposition could only be achieved by constant self improvement, the pursuit of which was Socrates’ sole goal in life. In the Apology, Socrates proves his commitment to the virtuous improvement of Athenians by referring to his negligence of his private concerns to concentrate on his divinely bestowed task of advising in people publicly or privately to aim to virtue. As a result of his diligent performance in his duty, he was on trial charged with leading astray the youth. The fruits of his labors were many powerful enemies and his own poverty. According to Socrates, Examination of life is aspiring to improvement of the soul, absolute honesty, desire for knowledge, discernment of the known and the unknown (wisdom) and correct priority in attending to matters .

4. He Taught Us to Ask if There’s Such a Thing as a Just War

“It is better to suffer wrong than to do wrong,” believed Socrates. As a soldier in the Greek army during the Peloponnesian War, one who distinguished himself several times for his bravery, Socrates saw enough of military conflict to understand first hand the suffering and devastation it caused.

His was one of the first voices in history to ponder whether there really is such a thing as a just war – a war for a cause so true it was worth bloodshed on a mass scale.

5. He Advocated True Freedom of Speech

Athens was one of the first polities in the world to allow freedom of speech –all from lowly shoemakers and merchants to rich nobles were allowed to address the Athenian Assembly. Yet they had to speak with aidos – “a sense of shame, a ‘knowing-your-placeness’” as Hughes describes it in The Hemlock Cup.

Socrates rebelled against this convention, by developing a system of true free-speech through his dialogue. Athens was uneasy was this, but he spoke his mind anyway (and ultimately paid the price for it). He was way ahead of his time in standing-up for the free expression of ideas – something that remains a cornerstone of democratic society today.

6. He Invented Philosophical Ethics

“What is the right way to live?” pondered Socrates. He was one of the very first philosophers in history to encourage scholars and common citizens to turn their attention from the outside world to the condition of humankind – and to ask a simple, honest and undoubtedly critical question: what is right and what is wrong? With it, he effectively created philosophical ethics – the debate between good and evil – which has shaped moral and legal codes throughout the Western world.

7. He Was a Champion of Human Virtue

Shaped probably by some of the terrible sights he witnessed on the battlefields at Potidaea, Amphipolis and Delium during his military service, Socrates developed a notion of human virtue at odds with the then-prevailing attitude of lex talionis – an eye for an eye. He believed in a mixture of temperance, justice, piety and courage – all of which led ultimately to wisdom. He had seen so much bad, he wanted to search for something good.

Socrates was a firm believer in friendship and community, and common threads between all of mankind. “Virtue,” he said, “is the most valuable of all possessions.” We can always benefit from being a bit nicer to each other.

8. He Warned Us of the Follies of Materialism

Socrates typically cut a pretty down-trodden figure when he wandered the streets of Athens – he never wore shoes, and sported the same tattered woolen cloak all year round. He was mocked for it by his contemporaries, but he didn’t care – his humble attire was a physical reflection of his belief that the pursuit of plenty could only bring mindless materialism.

He even had the gall to suggest to Athenians that they might be better themselves pursuing well-being rather than wealth – words that ring truer than ever in consumerist modern society.

9. He Taught Us the Value of Civil Disobedience

Socrates was known as the “gadfly” of the Greek state – he saw it as his responsibility to sting the government into action in areas where it could improve its conduct. He wasn’t frightened to publicly speak his mind on the subject of bad governance, no matter the cost. One illustrative quote goes: “It seems strange enough to me that a herdsman who lets his cattle decrease and go to the bad should not admit that he is a poor cowherd; but stranger still that a statesman when he causes the citizens to decrease and go to the bad, should feel no shame nor think himself a poor statesman.”

As a famous modern advocate of civil disobedience Martin Luther King put it in a letter from an Alabama Prison in 1963: “Just as Socrates felt that it was necessary to create a tension in the mind so that individuals could rise from the bondage of myths and half-truths… so we must see the need for non-violent gadflies to create the kind of tension in society that will help men rise from the dark depths of prejudice and racism.”

10. He Taught Us to Stand Up For What We Believe

Socrates lived and breathed his philosophies – however much they were scorned, ridiculed, laughed at or feared – and he ultimately died by them. The state swatted its gadfly, by trying him as a “corrupter of youth” and forcing him to commit suicide by poisoning himself.

He could have renounced his beliefs, and made a groveling defence during his trial – but he chose instead to stand tall to the last and accept his punishment, even turning down an opportunity to escape. There was undoubtedly a degree of recklessness and martyrdom to Socrates death, but the lesson it teaches us about standing up for what we believe in to the very end remains powerful and enduring.

Socrates’ criticism of democracy

Socrates’ analysis of the hatred he has incurred is one part of a larger theme that he dwells on throughout his speech. Athens is a democracy, a city in which the many are the dominant power in politics, and it can therefore be expected to have all the vices of the many. Because most people hate to be tested in argument, they will always take action of some sort against those who provoke them with questions. But that is not the only accusation Socrates brings forward against his city and its politics. He tells his democratic audience that he was right to have withdrawn from political life, because a good person who fights for justice in a democracy will be killed. In his cross-examination of Meletus, he insists that only a few people can acquire the knowledge necessary for improving the young of any species, and that the many will inevitably do a poor job. He criticizes the Assembly for its illegal actions and the Athenian courts for the ease with which matters of justice are distorted by emotional pleading. Socrates implies that the very nature of democracy makes it a corrupt political system. Bitter experience has taught him that most people rest content with a superficial understanding of the most urgent human questions. When they are given great power, their shallowness inevitably leads to injustice.

If the majority of the people are too uninformed, lackadaisical, or apathetic to make the democratic process rational and effective, then they just reveal their inherent nature It is not an upper class that keeps the demos unenlightened, but it is the people's own disposition that makes them eschew enlightenment, and thus dependent on some sort of rulers. If people did not naturally have the disposition they display in a dysfunctional democracy, other people would not be able to exploit and mislead them the way they do. (Plato)

Development as Freedom



Poverty As Capability Deprivation



Women's Agency and Social Change


Saturday, July 20, 2013

Men of Rock


Professor Iain Stewart traces the story of how the landscape of Scotland revealed to the world how the planet works. A band of pioneer geologists in Scotland were the first to work out the true age of the Earth, measure earthquakes, understand supervolcanoes, discover the ice ages and explain how continents move around the surface of the planet. This new three-part series takes us through the latest science about the Earth and shows how these early mavericks and visionaries came up with revolutionary ideas that changed scientific understanding of the world forever.

Deep Time

Iain Stewart follows in the footsteps of the founding father of geology, James Hutton. This Scottish rogue was a profound and original thinker who, 250 years ago, overturned ancient beliefs about how and when the world was formed. His ideas clashed with those of the most eminent scientist of his day. Lord Kelvin was determined to prove Hutton wrong. 



Moving Mountains

Geologist Iain Stewart retraces the steps of a band of maverick pioneers who made ground-breaking discoveries in the landscape of Scotland about how our planet works.Iain finds out how gung-ho geologist Edward Bailey discovered Scotland was once home to super volcanoes. And how unsung hero Arthur Holmes solved the mystery of what makes continents move across the surface of the globe.


The Big Freeze

Geologist Iain Stewart retraces the steps of a band of maverick pioneers who made ground-breaking discoveries in the landscape of Scotland about how our planet works.In the final episode, Iain finds out about daredevil scientist Louis Agassiz, who first imagined the world had been gripped by an ice age. Plus, the story of humble janitor James Croll, who used the planets to work out the natural rhythms of the earth's climate.



Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Introduction to Ethics


"Ethics is the activity of man directed to secure the inner perfection of his own personality.”
~ Albert Schweitzer

"In law a man is guilty when he violates the rights of others. In ethics he is guilty if he only thinks of doing so."
— Immanuel Kant

"Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do."
- Potter Stewart

"The first step in the evolution of ethics is a sense of solidarity with other human beings."
- Albert Schweitzer

"Ethics and equity and the principles of justice do not change with the calendar."
- David Herbert Lawrence

“A man without ethics is a wild beast loosed upon this world.”
-Albert Camus

“Education without values, as useful as it is, seems rather to make man a more clever devil.”
― C.S. Lewis

“Educating the mind without educating the heart is no education at all.”
― Aristotle

“It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets.”
― Voltaire

“I count him braver who overcomes his desires than him who conquers his enemies, for the hardest victory is over self.”
― Aristotle

Philosophical Ethics could be called the study of what is good and bad.

The pursuit of moral knowledge dates back to Ancient Greek philosophers, but it is mostly the influence of Enlightenment moral thought that continues to shape ethics today. There are many well-known figures in the history of ethics, including the Greek philosophers Plato and Aristotle, but some of the most important modern influences include such people as Immanuel Kant, Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill, D.W. Ross, C.L. Stevenson, Alasdair MacIntyre, and John Rawls.

In ethics, a premium is placed upon defining "the good". Different approaches to defining the good, the nature of moral properties, the source of moral knowledge, and the status of moral facts have played an important role in shaping various branches of moral theory. The three major divisions of ethical philosophy may be called Virtue Ethics, Deontology, and Consequentialism.

Ethics stem from the question "What is right?" Whoever decides the answer to that question is a law maker.

Ethics is the philosophical attempt to answer Socrates' question of how one should live. This is a very general question, which could for any individual translate to "How should I live?" It is important however to note that not all answers to this question are answers of the ethical type. One could conclude that one should live a self-indulgent life without any kind of logical contradiction. Moral philosophers study this idea, known as “egoism,” as well, and the question "Why be moral?" is because of this distinct from Socrates' question.

It is also important to note that Socrates' question not only allows for non-ethical answers but also answers from different ethical theories. His question is not the same as Kant's question "What is my duty?" or the egoist/utilitarian question of "How can we be happy?" There are many different ways of answering Socrates' question, and answers from the Categorical Imperative to the imperative "Sit on the couch and watch television" are equally answers to it, but Ethics attempts to find through reason the best answer to the question.

Ethics, often called Morality interchangeably, tries to answer "How should one live?" given that we already live in a society. Everyone is born with a place in society even if it is only "Stranger," and accordingly everyone has expectations for action placed upon them. One is expected to act a certain way as a brother, a friend, and a passer-by. Ethics primarily concerns itself with this realm of individual action. For the most part, ethical theories attempt to develop a system of obligations that we have towards others. Obligations that are common among different theories are the obligation to tell the truth, the obligation to help those in distress, and the obligation not to murder. Of course, most of the theories allow for flexibility based on the situation such as the ability to help in this circumstance and whether one has any other, higher obligations.

The ethical theories of the past have been of many types. Aristotle proposed a theory of virtue, a notion that was already a part of Greek culture. He espoused the view that the good man is one who lives in a way as to allow him to move towards the goal of man-as-such, the telos, and the way to reach the telos is to live a life of virtue.

Another prominent theory has been consequentialism. This theory includes John Stuart Mill’s utilitarianism, and its focus is, from its name, on the consequences of one’s actions. General consequentialism will say we have obligations to help people because helping people produces a better result than not helping people. Utilitarianism goes beyond this to mathematize ethics. It quantifies the utility, which it defines as “happiness” or “pleasure,” a given action will produce and weighs that number against the amount of utility produced by another action. Whichever action produces the most utility is the one that is obligated.

A third common ethical theory is deontology, and its main supporter has been Kant. Deontology is the study of obligations in a very narrow sense. It attempts to divine from reason alone the obligations every man holds simply because he is a rational being. Kant first argues for what he calls the Categorical Imperative, and from that it is possible to derive other universal maxims, which follow the formula “When in situation X, do Y.” Kant has two formulations of his Categorical Imperative. The first is Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law. The second, which Kant claims carries the same meaning, is "Act in such a way that you always treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never simply as a means, but always at the same time as an end."

When considering ethics, it is also important to note that the Enlightenment project of justifying morality is judged by some prominent contemporary moral philosophers to have been a failure. These contemporary philosophers take it to be that morality cannot be grounded in reason alone. Three important alternatives are the philosophies of Alasdair MacIntyre, Richard Rorty, and Bernard Williams. MacIntyre advocates a return to the Aristotelian tradition of living out the virtues in reference to the telos, or goal, of man. Rorty is a pragmatist and argues that the question we must ask of every moral obligation is “Is this useful?” He would argue that treating strangers with distrust and keeping promises are good moral principles because they are primarily useful for building a better society. Finally, Williams critiques ethical theory on the whole and the notion of obligation. He also asks why ethics is taken to be a better answer to Socrates’ question than non-ethical answers.


Types

Normative ethics deals with questions of what we ought to do, or what things are good to do.

What behavior (or intentions) are good or bad?
What kind of things can be adduced as moral justifications ("justifying reasons") for certain kinds of behavior?
Is killing another human being (murder) morally acceptable? Killing an enemy in war? Ethnic cleansing?
Killing a person in self-defense? Executing a convicted murderer? Assisting a terminally ill person to die?
Killing yourself? Abortion? Abortion of a deformed fetus? Killing of an animal?
Do animals have rights? Do women? Children? Mentally handicapped people?
Is torture ever justified? Theft? Lying? Promise-breaking?
What is the best way for human beings to lead their lives?
What are the justifying reasons for war? Is there such a thing as a "just war"?
Can the cultural practices of other times and societies be condemned as immoral? How about American slavery? Segregation and apartheid? Chinese footbinding? African female genital mutilation? Mormon or Muslim polygamy?
What are the proper bounds for the toleration of diversity, or the respect for personal privacy? Is there a point at which the (proper) toleration of diversity or respect for privacy becomes (improper) passive acceptance of immorality? What is that point?

Meta-ethics deals with questions about the nature of ethics.

What do ethical words such as "good", "right", "wrong", "ought" mean?
What makes a judgment a moral judgment as opposed to, say, an aesthetic judgment, or an etiquette judgment, or a simple personal preference?
What is the basis of moral law? Divine command? Natural law? Human nature? Custom?
Why should we be moral? What is the motivational basis of moral behavior? What "motivating reasons" (as opposed to "justifying reasons" can be made for moral behavior?
Why do people act morally?
Is it possible for some behavior to be right in one society/culture, and wrong in another?
What is the moral basis for law? Is there a moral basis for laws? Should there be a moral basis for law? Should we try to enforce moral behavior by legal means?

History of Ethics deals with the study of what philosophers have written in the past on the subject of ethics.

The boundary is not always sharply-drawn between questions of normative ethics and meta-ethics. Ethical questions can easily shade off into other areas of philosophy, for example into philosophy of law and philosophy of religion. And of course the study of the history of ethical thought is inter-twined with all topics in ethics: almost all ethical questions have been discussed in the past, and ethics continues to progress as an ongoing conversation between living and historical thinkers.

Source : wikibooks




Thursday, June 6, 2013

Emotional Intelligence


What is Emotional Intelligence ? 

Emotional intelligence is the ability to identify, assess, and control the emotions of oneself, of others, and of groups.Emotional intelligence refers to the ability to perceive, control and evaluate emotions.The earliest roots of emotional intelligence can be traced to Charles Darwin's work on the importance of emotional expression for survival and, second, adaptation.

Since 1990, Peter Salovey and John D. Mayer have been the leading researchers on emotional intelligence. In their influential article "Emotional Intelligence," they defined emotional intelligence as, "the subset of social intelligence that involves the ability to monitor one's own and others' feelings and emotions, to discriminate among them and to use this information to guide one's thinking and actions" .Following their continuing research, their initial definition of Emotional intelligence was revised to "The ability to perceive emotion, integrate emotion to facilitate thought, understand emotions and to regulate emotions to promote personal growth."

Substantial disagreement exists regarding the definition of  Emotional intelligence,with respect to both terminology and operationalizations. Currently, there are three main models of Emotional intelligence :
  1. Ability model
  2. Mixed model
  3. Trait model 
Ability model : Salovey and Mayer

The model proposes that individuals vary in their ability to process information of an emotional nature and in their ability to relate emotional processing to a wider cognition. This ability is seen to manifest itself in certain adaptive behaviors. The model identified four different factors of emotional intelligence:

Perceiving emotions – the ability to detect and decipher emotions in faces, pictures, voices,body langauge and cultural artifacts—including the ability to identify one's own emotions. Perceiving emotions represents a basic aspect of emotional intelligence, as it makes all other processing of emotional information possible.

Using emotions – Using emotions to promote thinking and cognitive activity. Emotions help prioritize what we pay attention and react to; we respond emotionally to things that garner our attention.The emotionally intelligent person can capitalize fully upon his or her changing moods in order to best fit the task at hand.

Understanding emotions – the ability to comprehend emotion language and to appreciate complicated relationships among emotions. For example, understanding emotions encompasses the ability to be sensitive to slight variations between emotions, and the ability to recognize and describe how emotions evolve over time.

Managing emotions – the ability to regulate emotions in both ourselves and in others, responding appropriately and responding to the emotions of others are all important aspect of emotional management. Therefore, the emotionally intelligent person can harness emotions, even negative ones, and manage them to achieve intended goals.



Mixed model : Daniel Goleman

The model introduced by Daniel Goleman focuses on Emotional Intelligence as a wide array of competencies and skills that drive leadership performance. Goleman's model outlines five main Emotional Intelligence constructs :

Self-awareness – the ability to know one's emotions, strengths, weaknesses, drives, values and goals and recognize their impact on others while using gut feelings to guide decisions.( (emotional self-awareness, accurate self-assessment and self confidence)

Self-regulation
– involves controlling or redirecting one's disruptive emotions and impulses and adapting to changing circumstances.(emotional self-control, transparency, trustworthiness, adaptability, achievement orientation, initiative, optimism, conscientiousness)

Social skill – managing relationships to move people in the desired direction.

Empathy - considering other people's feelings especially when making decisions and

Motivation - being driven to achieve for the sake of achievement.



Emotional Intelligence Traits

The research of Psychologists, Medical Doctors and other researchers have found thirteen key emotional intelligence traits.

EMOTIONAL ENERGY: The amount of energy available to cope with frustration, conflict, or pressure.

EMOTIONAL STRESS: The amount of inner stress experienced.

OPTIMISM: To consider what is positive or right; to be optimistic.

SELF-ESTEEM: To value self and to be self-accepting.

COMMITMENT TO WORK: To work hard; to get things done; to take on responsibility.

ATTENTION TO DETAIL: To think things through; to concentrate on details; to be thorough; to be careful; to strive to be accurate.

DESIRE FOR CHANGE: To create changes or improvements in one's environment; to vary one's patterns of behavior.

COURAGE: To do what is challenging, or unfamiliar; to risk injury, loss, hardship, or discomfort to reach a desired goal.

SELF-DIRECTION: To make decisions/goals; to set priorities; to initiate action.

ASSERTIVENESS: Saying what one thinks. Trying to convince others. Telling others what one wants, needs, requires, or expects. Exercising power and authority. Engaging in interpersonal conflict. Confronting, openly disagreeing, saying no, taking unpopular positions.

TOLERANCE: To be tolerant, patient, accepting, and cooperative.

CONSIDERATION FOR OTHERS: To be considerate, understanding, helpful, honest, and responsible.

SOCIABILITY: To be outgoing and sociable. To seek and to enjoy others' company and conversation.

Facets --------High Scorers in Emotional Intelligence are..

Adaptability --- flexible and willing to adapt to new conditions.

Assertiveness ---.forthright, frank, and willing to stand up for their rights.

Emotion perception (self and others)---clear about their own and other people’s feelings.

Emotion expression --- capable of communicating their feelings to others.

Emotion management (others) --- capable of influencing other people’s feelings.

Emotion regulation --- capable of controlling their emotions.

Impulsiveness (low) --- reflective and less likely to give in to their urges.

Relationships --- capable of having fulfilling personal relationships.

Self-esteem --- successful and self-confident.

Self-motivation --- driven and unlikely to give up in the face of adversity.

Social awareness --- accomplished networkers with excellent social skills.

Stress management --- capable of withstanding pressure and regulating stress.

Trait empathy --- capable of taking someone else’s perspective.

Trait happiness --- cheerful and satisfied with their lives.

Trait optimism --- confident and likely to “look on the bright side” of life.



Application in Administration and Governance 
  • Emotional Intelligence has a significant impact on team member relationships and their effectiveness in reaching a team’s goals. Understanding our own EI strengths and weaknesses, as well as those of other team members, provides a means for improving the interpersonal dynamics of teamwork. 
  • Since research on Emotional Intelligence began, results overwhelmingly show that people high in various combinations of emotional competencies outperform people who are weak in those areas. When emotional competencies are used in leader selection, for example, performance and retention rates increase significantly.
  • Emotional Intelligence significantly influences how we go about solving interpersonal problems. Thus, conflict in organizations often stems from EI differences. Understanding how to use our EI more effectively helps us solve interpersonal problems more effectively and efficiently and increases the overall effectiveness of work teams.
  • Employees need consistency from their leaders,they need to know that a leader will respond in a consistent manner to a certain situation, so that they can bring questions, concerns, problems to their leader and know they will get a fair hearing and a consistent response. The best leaders use Emotional Intelligence to manage their emotions so that their responses are consistent, calm, and fair, and not reactive in nature.
  • Emotional Intelligence is comprised of intrapersonal skills – understanding yourself, how you react and respond in different situations emotionally; and interpersonal skills – understanding others, and how they react and respond emotionally in different situations. As we think through how certain thoughts, actions, or triggers set off certain emotional responses, we can better manage those thoughts, actions or triggers, so that we respond rather than react. By not allowing the emotional trigger to take over, we maintain control over the situation, and can then create a positive interaction instead of an emotional hijacking.





Some ways for developing Emotional Intelligence 

-Look at yourself honestly and commit to specific areas of self-improvement.
-Think through the possible impact of your words before you speak.
-Avoid judging the actions of others before you have all of the facts.
-Be accountable for what you do and follow through on what you say you will do.
-Listen to opposing viewpoints and admit when you are wrong.
-Praise others and give credit where credit is due.
-Analyze your common emotions in times of stress, and work to control them.
-Be consistently and genuinely respectful.
-Curb negative thoughts and work to foster optimism.
-Work at becoming a better listener.
-Agree to disagree with those who have incompatible beliefs.