Monday, September 10, 2012

Resposibility to Protect ( R2P )



The Responsibility to Protect (“RtoP” or “R2P”) is a new international security and human rights norm to address the international community’s failure to prevent and stop genocides, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity.

 Origin

This concept grew out of genocide and ethnic cleansing in Rwanda and Srebrenica in the 1990s.

The doctrine of the responsibility to protect was first elaborated in 2001 by a group of prominent international human rights leaders comprising the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Under their mandate, the Commission sought to undertake the two-fold challenge of reconciling the international community's responsibility to address massive violations of humanitarian norms and ensuring respect for the sovereign rights of nation states.The "responsibility to protect" doctrine received renewed emphasis in 2004 when the United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan created the High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges, and Change. The Panel was established to identify major threats facing the international community in the broad field of peace and security and to generate new ideas about policies and institutions aimed at preventing or confronting these challenges.The panel suggested collective international responsibility to protect, exercisable by the Security Council authorizing military intervention as a last resort, in the event of genocide and other large scale killing, ethnic cleansing or serious violations of international humanitarian law which sovereign Governments have proved powerless or unwilling to prevent.

In September 2005, R2P was once again enlivened, this time with the full support of the international community. At the 60th session of the U.N. General Assembly gathering, 191 heads of state and government representatives unanimously endorsed a resolution supporting the Responsibility to Protect doctrine. This resolution laid the foundations for a new global moral compact between every State and every population on earth. As adopted, atrocity crimes , genocide, crimes against humanity (including ethnic cleansing) and war crimes - were considered a universal concern and therefore were responsibility of the international community.

This commitment, entitled the Responsibility to Protect, is based on the idea that sovereignty is not a right, but a responsibility.

It stipulates that :
  • The State carries the primary responsibility for protecting populations from genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing, and their incitement.
  • The international community has a responsibility to encourage and assist States in fulfilling this responsibility.
  • The international community has a responsibility to use appropriate diplomatic, humanitarian and other means to protect populations from these crimes. If a State is manifestly failing to protect its populations, the international community must be prepared to take collective action to protect populations, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.

India’s position :

India is in support of the R2P concept but it considers many a unilateral actions by the Western powesr in the recent past unjustified.

India recently told a United Nations meeting on R2P concept that Western air strikes on Libya were a complete violation of the U.N. Security Council’s resolution number 1973.

The fundamental aspects of the concept as India sees them are as follows:
  1.  R2P cannot be used to address all social evils, including violations of human rights and humanitarian law.  Rather it must only be confined to the four identified crimes, i.e., genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity.  
  2. The default response of the international community cannot be coercive measures under Chapter VII of the Charter.
  3. In reality R2P cannot be seen as a pretext for humanitarian intervention. 
  4. R2P also cannot turn out to be a tool legitimizing big power intervention on the pretext of protecting populations from the violations of human rights and humanitarian law. 
  5. It cannot be seen as codifying a system of coercion, providing a tool in the hands of powerful governments to judge weaker states, and encourage regime change primarily on political considerations.
  6. Armed intervention can be a measure of last resort when everything else has failed. Selectivity must be avoided at all cost and the principle must be applied uniformly to all parties to a conflict.
  7. The implementation of R2P requires an effective discharge of responsibility and obligations by states under the U.N. Charter in a balanced and impartial manner.







Sunday, September 9, 2012

Hydrogeology




Hydrogeology (hydro- meaning water, and -geology meaning the study of the Earth) is the area of geology that deals with the distribution and movement of groundwater in the soil and rocks of the Earth's crust,commonly in aquifers.The term geohydrology is often used interchangeably.The study of the interaction between groundwater movement and geology can be quite complex. Groundwater does not always flow in the subsurface down-hill following the surface topography. Groundwater follows pressure gradients (flow from high pressure gradient to low) often following fractures and conduits in circuitous paths.Aquifers are broadly classified as being either confined or unconfined (water table aquifers), and either saturated or unsaturated,the type of aquifer affects the properties that control the flow of water in that medium. 

What is Ground Water ?

Ground water is the water that is found beneath the earth's surface. It is the water that fills pores and fractures in the ground.

Water table and Vadose Zone 

The top of the ground water is called water table. Water table is the boundary between unsaturated zone and saturated zone  Between water table and land surface is the unsaturated or vadose zone.In the unsaturated zone/Vadose zone water moves downward to the water table to recharge the ground water .

The vadose zone, also termed the unsaturated zone, is the part of Earth between the land surface and the top of the phreatic zone i.e. the position at which the groundwater (the water in the soil's pores) is at atmospheric pressure ("vadose" is Latin for "shallow"). Hence the vadose zone extends from the top of the ground surface to the water table. Water in the vadose zone has a pressure head less than atmospheric pressure, and is retained by a combination of adhesion (funiculary groundwater), and capillary action (capillary groundwater). If the vadose zone envelops soil, the water contained therein is termed soil moisture. In fine grained soils, capillary action can cause the pores of the soil to be fully saturated above the water table at a pressure less than atmospheric. In such soils, therefore, the unsaturated zone is the upper section of the vadose zone and not identical to it.

Movement of water within the vadose zone is studied within soil physics and hydrology, particularly hydrogeology, and is of importance to agriculture, contaminant transport, and flood control.


What is an Aquifer ? 

Aquifer - "A water-bearing layer of rock, or of unconsolidated sediments, that will yield water in a usable quantity to a well or spring.".Aquifers are typically saturated regions of the subsurface that produce an economically feasible quantity of water to a well or spring .There are two basic types of aquifers: confined and unconfined.

 An aquifer is considered unconfined if water only partially fills the aquifer materials and water freely rises and declines along the unsaturated/saturated zone boundary. These unconfined aquifers are often referred to as water-table aquifers and wells that are opened to these unconfined aquifers indicates the position of the water-table. It can also be defined as an aquifer whose upper boundary is defined by the water table (water is at atmospheric pressure). Water usually saturates only part of the geologic unit and there is no upper confining layer. Also called a "water table aquifer".

 A confined aquifer is generally defined when water completely fills the aquifer materials and is overlain by a confining bed. A common term for a confined aquifer is an artesian aquifer. The water level from a well that permits water solely from a confined aquifer to enter the well will stand at some point above the top of the confined aquifer but not necessarily above the land surface. The water level in a well open to a specific confined aquifer stands at the level of the potentiometric surface. If the potentiometric surface is above land, the well is often considered as a free-flowing artesian well.It can also be defined as a fully saturated aquifer whose upper and lower boundaries are impervious geologic units. Water is held under pressure and the water level in wells stands above the top of the aquifer.

Confining Bed - "A layer of rock, or of unconsolidated sediments, that retards the movement of water in and out of an aquifer and possesses a very low hydraulic conductivity."






  Water is continually recycled through aquifer systems. Groundwater recharge is any water added to the aquifer zone. Processes that contribute to groundwater recharge include precipitation, streamflow, leakage (reservoirs, lakes, aqueducts), and artificial means (injection wells). Groundwater discharge is any process that removes water from an aquifer system. Natural springs and artificial wells are examples of discharge processes.

 Pumping water from a well causes a cone of depression to form in the water table at the well site. Overpumping can have two effects. It can cause a change in the groundwater flow direction. It also lowers the water table, making it necessary to dig a deeper well.



  Factors influencing groundwater flow :

   Many factors influence groundwater movement such as hydraulic head, hydraulic gradient, and velocity which was based on Darcy's Law.Other influencing factors include soil and aquifer properties, aquifer type, geology, and topography.   ( Movement of groundwater depends on rock and sediment properties and the groundwater’s flow potential. Porosity, permeability, specific yield and specific retention are important properties of groundwater flow.)

Topography

Ground water general flows away from topographical high spots and toward topographic lows.
 
Porosity of Earth Materials 

Porosity is percentage of rock or soil that is void of solid material.

Porosity is the volume of pore space relative to the total volume (rock and/or sediment + pore space). Primary porosity (% pore space) is the initial void space present (intergranular) when the rock formed. Secondary porosity (% added openings) develops later. It is the result of fracturing, faulting, or dissolution. Grain shape and cementation also affect porosity.

Effective Porosity = porosity available for fluid flow (interconnected and large enough pore throats)

Porosity depends on packing of grains (cubic or rhombohedral), grain size distribution (sorting), and shape of grains. Porosity  depends on the range of grain size (sorting) and shape of the subject material, but not on the size. Fine-grained materials tend to be better sorted than coarse-grained materials, thereby exhibiting greater porosities.

Permeability is the capability of a rock to allow the passage of fluids. Permeability is dependent on the size of pore spaces and to what degree the pore spaces are connected. Grain shape, grain packing, and cementation  affect permeability.

Aquifer properties :

An aquitard is a zone within the earth that restricts the flow of groundwater from one aquifer to another. An aquitard can sometimes, if completely impermeable, be called an aquiclude or aquifuge. Aquitards comprise layers of either clay or non-porous rock with low hydraulic conductivity.

Storativity

Storativity is the volume of water released from storage per unit decline in hydraulic head in the aquifer, per unit area of the aquifer.Confined aquifers have very low storativity values which means that the aquifer is storing water .. Unconfined aquifers have storativities (typically then called specific yield) greater than , they release water from storage by the mechanism of actually draining the pores of the aquifer, releasing relatively large amounts of water .

Specific Yield

Specific yield is the ratio of the volume of water that drains from a saturated rock owing to the attraction of gravity to the total volume of the rock. (indicates the amount of water released due to drainage from lowering the water table in an unconfined aquifer. ). Grain size has a definite effect on specific yield. Maximum specific yield occurs in medium to coarse sand size sediments.  Smaller grains have larger surface areas.Larger surface areas mean more surface tension. Fine-grained sediment will have a lower specific yield than more coarsely-grained sediment. Sorting of material affects groundwater movement.Poorly sorted material is less porous than well-sorted material.

Specific Retention 

The ratio of the volume of water a rock can retain against gravity drainage to the total volume of the rock or Specific retention (Sr) is the ratio of the volume of water a rock can retain (in spite of gravity) to the total volume of rock.

Specific yield plus specific retention equals porosity (often designated with the Greek letter phi).

P = Sy + Sr

Porosity, permeability, specific yield, and specific retention are all components of hydraulic conductivity.

Hydraulic Conductivity  is the ability of subsurface materials (sand, rock etc.) to allow a fluid (ie water) to flow through it.

Hydraulic Head

Water entering an unconfined or confined well will stand at a particular level. This level is often termed as the hydraulic head and is actually the sum of three components - the pressure head, elevation head and velocity head. The velocity head is often disregarded because ground water movement in most cases is relatively slow.In an aquifer the altitude to which rise in a properly constructed well is the Hydraulic Head.

 Hydraulic Gradient

 The change in hydraulic head (pressure) per unit distance in a given direction (dimensionless). It is the driving force of fluid flow in a porous medium.

Darcy's Law

 Henry Darcy was a French engineer who studied the movement of water through sand in 1856. He found that the rate of water flow through a tube is proportional to the difference in the height of the water between the two ends of the tube, and inversely proportional to the length of the tube. He also discovered that flow was proportional to a coefficient, K, which is called hydraulic conductivity.



More Details : 

Water Report Hydrology

Theory of Evolution


Evolution through natural selection explains why species were so well adapted to their environment and how new species would form. The theory of evolution is considered to be fundamental not only to biology, but also to many aspects of contemporary science. Darwin’s ideas have also had a wide-reaching influence on theologians, historians, psychologists, philosophers, and sociologists.

Evolution Today

Evolution is not just relevant to the past, but it is also important in the present and the future. It is the foundation for all of modern biology, including research critical to human welfare, medicine and the fight against diseases. For example, an understanding of evolution is important in the fight against emerging diseases like HIV and pandemic flu, which have crossed the species barrier from other primates (HIV) or domestic livestock (flu) when they acquire the genes to do so, either from other microbes or by mutation. It explains the development of antibiotic resistance that has led to MRSA, multi-drug resistant TB and other drug-resistant bacteria becoming such problems today; and why the insecticides used for the control of the mosquitoes that transmit malaria are no longer as effective as they once were.

Darwin’s theory of evolution in a nutshell

Darwin noticed that even within a species there was variation, and that new varieties arose from time to time. Some of this variation was passed from parent to offspring, with the new generation closely resembling their parents. The mechanism through which this happened was not understood at the time, but was nonetheless widely recognised, and had been used for many years in the selective breeding of new varieties of domestic animals, and improved agricultural crops.

Darwin also recognised that organisms produce many more offspring than survive to reproduce. He postulated that this would inevitably result in a “struggle for existence” - a competition for food and resources - whereby those most suited to their environment would survive in favour of those with less favourable characteristics. Over many generations the differential survival of those with favourable characteristics would lead to the development of new forms, and ultimately of new species. He called this process natural selection: the survival and reproduction of organisms suited to their environment, at the expense of those less successful.

Darwin did not invent the idea of evolution. What made Darwin different from all earlier evolutionists was his discovery of how evolution works – through the process of natural selection. One hundred and fifty years after the publication of ‘On the Origin of Species’ Darwin's theory of evolution remains the only scientific explanation for the spectacular diversity of life on earth.

Controversy today

Darwin’s revolutionary ideas changed scientific thought forever, but it was the synthesis of his ideas with genetics, that explained how inherited characteristics are passed down through the generations (and also how new variation occurred through minute genetic mutations) that drove the widespread acceptance of his ideas.

Evolution remains something of a controversial subject because it challenges some of the fundamental beliefs about the origin of man and man’s place in the animal kingdom. Darwin’s concept of natural selection has also been applied to human society, most notably by Herbert Spencer, who coined the term “survival of the fittest”.

Is “survival of the fittest” at the expense of the weak?

Not necessarily. In an evolutionary context the “fittest” are those that are best adapted to their environment and are thus reproductively most successful. Being “fit” in this context is not necessarily the same as being the strongest or the most sophisticated, but more the best “fit” to the environment.

The evidence to support the theory


Darwin spent 20 years painstakingly collating detailed evidence to support his theories prior to publication of ‘On the Origin of Species’ in 1859. He laid out the enormous diversity of living things, and described the equally impressive variation within single species, brought about by people controlling the breeding of dogs, horses, pigeons or cattle. He also related the slow appearance – and disappearance – of species in the record left by fossils in the rocks.

The critical evidence came from close comparisons. Comparing fossils from different periods showed gradual change over time. Comparing body plans and bone structures of different living species showed how they were related to one another.

Particularly important to the evidence was the life found on the Galapagos Archipelago. Species found in the same kind of environments on the mainland that could have flourished on islands were often absent – this suggested that the species that live on islands were not created there, but had somehow, in the past, managed to colonise the islands from the mainland.

“Look closer at the details,” Darwin urged, “and see that the flora and fauna of any particular island are related to those of the nearest mainland, but are slightly different”. All this suggested that the variations in species depended on how long they had been separated. The longer they had lived apart, the greater the chance that they would have changed in ways that distinguished them from a common ancestor, but enabled them to survive and thrive in their new environment.

From these types of idea Darwin began to postulate that all living things were related and could be descended from a set of common ancestors, with natural selection being the driving force behind this evolutionary change.

The early shortcomings of the theory

Despite providing extensive evidence to support his theories, Darwin was aware that there were gaps that needed filling in order to fully establish his theory. He even devoted a Chapter in ‘On the Origins of Species’ setting out shortcomings which he believed would be removed by later research. “Anyone whose disposition leads him to attach more weight to unexplained difficulties than to the explanation of certain number of facts will certainly reject my theory…I look with confidence to the future, to young and rising naturalists, who will be able to view both sides of the question with impartiality”.

Chief amongst these problems was a lack of understanding as to how inheritance worked. Darwin had no knowledge of the mechanism of genetics. At the time some thought that over time, blending would lead to increasingly homogenous populations, yet his theory of evolution through natural selection required exactly the opposite; it requires specific favourable variations to be passed down through generations to increase survival rate. It was not until Mendel’s research on genetics was re-discovered, that the genetic basis of variation and inheritance was understood. This shows that there is no blending of characteristics, and is confirmed by current knowledge of genetics. As such, offspring inherit a discrete set of genes from each parent and is in fact a composite of many different traits passed down by its parents and grandparents before them.

What can modern genetics and DNA tells us about evolution?

DNA not only confirms the scientific basis of evolution but it shows how it varies an organism’s characteristics. For example, by analysing the close similarity of their genetic code, scientists have today confirmed Darwin’s educated guess that the different species of Galapagos Finch did indeed evolve from a single common ancestor. The differences in beak shape that Darwin noted, which made the different species so well adapted to the varied environments found on the Galapagos Islands, are attributed to a single common gene. This gene expresses different proteins in the growing jaw of the finch embryo, resulting in the different beak types.

Looking closely at DNA reveals evidence as to how different species are related, because many important genes are shared across the animal kingdom. The longer the time since two species had a common ancestor, the more numerous the small differences in their genes are. So the human version of a gene is more like the chimpanzee version than that of a mouse or a fish; the mouse version is more like that of a rat.

Evolution occurring today

By virtue of the fact that evolution involves the progressive accumulation of favourable adaptations over many generations, it is often difficult to see in real time. However, some practical demonstrations of it occurring are seen in bacteria. The phenomenon of antibiotic resistance in bacteria (where bacteria are no-longer killed by antibiotic drugs) is as a direct result of evolution.

Antibiotics are toxic to the bacteria, and will kill them over a period of time (which is why antibiotics are given as a course over several days). If at the end of a five day course not all the bacteria are killed, the survivors will have a certain tolerance to that antibiotic. When these bacteria multiply, all the offspring will carry the ability to survive the antibiotic for five days - when these bacteria are exposed to the antibiotic, they will not even start to die until five days. Bacteria with this ability are better able to survive and reproduce, and therefore become the prevalent type of bacteria. The overall effect is that the bacteria have evolved from being killed by the antibiotic, to be resistant.

How new species form

The changes that eventually lead to the formation of a new species accumulate slowly over successive generations, but the results can be dramatic. A good example of this can be seen in the different varieties of domestic dog, albeit that these have resulted from human intervention and “artificial selection” rather than natural selection. The Chihuahua, Pekinese, Great Dane and St Bernard are all members of the same species, with its origin in the grey wolf, which was first domesticated around 15,000 years ago. However, the huge diversity in body shape and form in these breeds has been achieved through selective breeding over the last few centuries. If such profound shapes in shape and form could be achieved in such a relatively short period of time, what diversity could be achieved in far greater timescales? We now know that the earth is around 4.6 billion years old and that there has been life on earth for around 3.5 billion years. The divergence of humans and chimps from a common ancestor is believed to have occurred around 6 million years ago, with our direct ancestors evolving in Africa some 200,000 years ago.




Source : Darwin's Origin of Species ( British Council )

Thursday, September 6, 2012

Ape to Man







It has long been considered the most compelling question in our history: Where do human beings come from? Although life has existed for millions of years, only in the past century-and-a-half have we begun to use science to explore the ancestral roots of our own species.

The search for the ultimate answer has taken a number of twists and turns, with careers made and broken along the way. Ape to Man is the story of the quest to find the origins of the human race – a quest that spanned more than 150 years of obsessive searching The search for the origins of humanity is a story of bones and the tales they tell.

It was in 1856 that the first bones of an extinct human ancestor were encountered, unearthed by a crew of unskilled laborers digging for limestone in Western Europe. The find, which would be known as Neanderthal Man, was seeing the light of day for the first time in more than 40,000 years.

At the time, the concept of a previous human species was virtually unthinkable. Yet just a few years later, Charles Darwin’s work The Origin of Species first broached the subject of evolution, and by the end of the nineteenth century, it had become the hottest topic of the age.

Adventurers had embarked on the search for the Missing Link, the single creature that represented the evolutionary leap from apes to humans. Ape to Man examines the major discoveries that have led us to the understanding we have today, including theories that never gained full acceptance in their time, an elaborate hoax that confused the scientific community for years, and the ultimate understanding of the key elements that separate man from apes.


The Story of Human Evolution  










Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA)






What is Foreign Contribution Regulation Act ?

The FCRA aims to regulate the acceptance and utilisation of foreign contribution and foreign hospitality by persons and associations .The focus of the Act is to ensure that the foreign contribution and foreign hospitality is not utilized to affect or influence electoral politics, public servants, judges and other people working the important areas of national life like journalists, printers and publishers of newspapers, etc. The Act also seeks to regulate flow of foreign funds to voluntary organizations with the objective of preventing any possible diversion of such funds towards activities detrimental to the national interest and to ensure that individuals and organizations may function in a manner consistent with the values of the sovereign democratic republic.

What is a foreign source according to the Act ?

(1) the Government of any foreign country or territory and any agency of such Government
(2) any international agency, not being the United Nations or any of its specialized agencies, the World Bank, International Monetary Fund
(3) a foreign company
(4) a corporation, not being a foreign company, incorporated in a foreign country or territory
(5) a multi-national corporation
(6) a foreign trust or a foreign foundation
(7) a citizen of a foreign country
(8) a trade union in any foreign country or territory

What is not considered as foreign contribution ?

Contributions made by a citizen of India living in another country (i.e., Non-Resident Indian who still hold Indian citizenship), from his personal savings, through the normal banking channels, is not treated as foreign contribution.Donation from an Indian who has acquired foreign citizenship is treated as foreign contribution. This will also apply to PIO card holders and to Overseas Citizens of India.

Who can receive foreign contribution?

A person/ngo/trust/association having a definite cultural, economic, educational, religious or social programme can receive foreign contribution after it obtains the prior permission of the Central Government, or gets itself registered with the Central Government.

Who cannot receive foreign contribution?

Foreign contribution cannot be accepted by :
(a) a candidate for election
(b) correspondent, columnist, cartoonist, editor, owner, printer or publisher of a registered newspaper
(c) Judge, government servant or employee of any Corporation or any other body controlled on owned by the Government
(d) member of any legislature
(e) political party
(f) organization of a political nature
(g) association or company engaged in the production or broadcast of audio news or audio visual news or current affairs programmes through any electronic mode
(h) correspondent or columnist, cartoonist, editor, owner of a media company.

What are the conditions to be met for the grant of registration and prior permission to receive foreign funds under FCRA ?

(a) The 'person' making an application for registration or grant of prior permission- (i) is not fictitious or benami; (ii) has not been prosecuted or convicted for indulging in activities aimed at conversion through inducement or force, either directly or indirectly, from one religious faith to another; (iii) has not been prosecuted or convicted for creating communal tension or disharmony in any specified district or any other part of the country; (iv) has not been found guilty of diversion or mis-utilisation of its funds; (v) is not engaged or likely to engage in propagation of sedition or advocate violent methods to achieve its ends; (vi) is not likely to use the foreign contribution for personal gains or divert it for undesirable purposes;(vii) has not contravened any of the provisions of this Act; (viii) has not been prohibited from accepting foreign contribution; (ix) the person being an individual, such individual has neither been convicted under any law for the time being in force nor any prosecution for any offence is pending against him.

(b).the acceptance of foreign contribution by the association/ person is not likely to affect prejudicially – (i) the sovereignty and integrity of India; or (ii) the security, strategic, scientific or economic interest of the State; or (iii) the public interest; or (iv) freedom or fairness of election to any Legislature; or (v) friendly relation with any foreign State; or (vi) harmony between religious, racial, social, linguistic, regional groups, castes or communities. (c) the acceptance of foreign contribution- (i) shall not lead to incitement of an offence; (ii) shall not endanger the life or physical safety of any person.

Can the NGOs invest the money received from foreign source ?

NGOs cannot use the foreign contributions for investment in Mutual Funds and other speculative investments,they cannot invest the foreign contribution received  in any  profitable ventures.

Is there any restriction on transfer of funds to other organisations?

The funds cannot be transferred from one organisation to other organisations unless such other person/org is also registered and had been granted the certificate or obtained the prior permission under this Act.

A person who has been granted a certificate of registration or prior permission under  and intends to transfer part of the foreign contribution received by him to a person who has not been granted a certificate of registration or prior permission under the Act, may transfer such foreign contribution to an extent not exceeding ten per cent of the total value thereof and for this purpose, make an application to the Central Government.

Can the Government suspend the certificate of registration granted to a person under FCRA?

Yes

Why is FCRA in news ?

Government cancelled the registration of many NGOs over violations in the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA).Use of foreign funds in the agitations and accounting irregularities led to action against NGOs under FCRA.